📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Bollywood Hungama
Entertainment
Delhi High Court asks Salman Khan to file response in Kala Hiran case
✍️ indiatoday.in
🗓 06 Oct 2026, 08:37 PM
👁 11
The Delhi High Court has issued a notice requiring actor Salman Khan to submit his reply in the ongoing legal dispute with Kala Hiran.
The Delhi High Court has formally asked Bollywood star Salman Khan to file his written response in the case filed by Kala Hiran. The notice was issued as part of the regular procedural steps in the civil suit, and the court has set a deadline for the actor to submit his reply.
Kala Hiran, the petitioner, had earlier approached the court alleging certain grievances against the actor. While the specifics of the claim have not been disclosed in the court order, the filing marks a continuation of a legal tussle that has attracted media attention.
Legal experts note that the court’s direction does not imply any judgment on the merits of the case; it merely ensures that both parties present their arguments. Salman Khan’s counsel is expected to file a response within the stipulated timeframe, after which the matter will proceed to the next hearing.
The development underscores the judiciary’s role in adjudicating disputes involving high‑profile personalities, and it remains to be seen how the case will evolve in subsequent proceedings.
Kala Hiran, the petitioner, had earlier approached the court alleging certain grievances against the actor. While the specifics of the claim have not been disclosed in the court order, the filing marks a continuation of a legal tussle that has attracted media attention.
Legal experts note that the court’s direction does not imply any judgment on the merits of the case; it merely ensures that both parties present their arguments. Salman Khan’s counsel is expected to file a response within the stipulated timeframe, after which the matter will proceed to the next hearing.
The development underscores the judiciary’s role in adjudicating disputes involving high‑profile personalities, and it remains to be seen how the case will evolve in subsequent proceedings.