📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Pulakit Singh
Politics
Delhi Court Challenge: Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam Appeal High Court Verdict to Supreme Court
✍️ Amar Ujala · Delhi
🗓 05 Nov 2026, 06:16 PM
👁 12
Activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam have filed a petition in the Supreme Court contesting the Delhi High Court's September 30, 2026 ruling.
Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam approached the Supreme Court of India on Thursday, seeking to overturn a judgment delivered by the Delhi High Court on September 30, 2026. The petition, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, argues that the High Court's order infringes on their fundamental rights and seeks a stay on its implementation.
The Delhi High Court's decision, which was rendered in a case related to the aftermath of the 2020 Delhi unrest, had upheld certain convictions and imposed restrictions on the two activists. Khalid and Imam contend that the ruling was based on procedural lapses and misinterpretation of evidence.
By bringing the matter before the apex court, the petitioners aim to secure a broader judicial review of the High Court's findings. The Supreme Court will now decide whether to admit the plea and, if so, will schedule hearings to examine the legal arguments presented.
Legal experts note that such challenges are not uncommon in high‑profile cases involving political activists, and the outcome could have implications for the handling of similar cases across the country.
The Delhi High Court's decision, which was rendered in a case related to the aftermath of the 2020 Delhi unrest, had upheld certain convictions and imposed restrictions on the two activists. Khalid and Imam contend that the ruling was based on procedural lapses and misinterpretation of evidence.
By bringing the matter before the apex court, the petitioners aim to secure a broader judicial review of the High Court's findings. The Supreme Court will now decide whether to admit the plea and, if so, will schedule hearings to examine the legal arguments presented.
Legal experts note that such challenges are not uncommon in high‑profile cases involving political activists, and the outcome could have implications for the handling of similar cases across the country.