📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / iMahesh
Crime
Man Divorces Wife Abroad, Remarries in Andhra Pradesh Using Foreign Laws
✍️ The Economic Times
🗓 12 Nov 2026, 04:16 PM
👁 21
A married man used foreign legal provisions to divorce his wife in Andhra Pradesh and subsequently remarried another woman, sparking controversy over the legality of the proceedings.
A man from Andhra Pradesh reportedly sought a divorce in a foreign jurisdiction, citing provisions that allow for a unilateral dissolution of marriage. The decree was later filed in an Andhra Pradesh court, where the local judiciary accepted the foreign judgment as valid.
Following the divorce, the same individual remarried a second woman in a ceremony held in the state. The rapid succession of legal and personal steps has drawn scrutiny from both the public and legal experts, who question whether the foreign divorce was properly recognized under Indian law.
Legal commentators note that while India accepts foreign divorce decrees under certain circumstances, the process typically requires a formal application and verification. Critics argue that the case may set a precedent for circumventing domestic matrimonial laws.
At present, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has not issued a definitive ruling on the matter, and the case remains under review. The parties involved have not released any statements, leaving the outcome uncertain.
Following the divorce, the same individual remarried a second woman in a ceremony held in the state. The rapid succession of legal and personal steps has drawn scrutiny from both the public and legal experts, who question whether the foreign divorce was properly recognized under Indian law.
Legal commentators note that while India accepts foreign divorce decrees under certain circumstances, the process typically requires a formal application and verification. Critics argue that the case may set a precedent for circumventing domestic matrimonial laws.
At present, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has not issued a definitive ruling on the matter, and the case remains under review. The parties involved have not released any statements, leaving the outcome uncertain.