📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / CommunityNotesContributor
International
Tate brothers argue they were merely role‑playing online in US court
✍️ Hindustan Times
🗓 28 Aug 2026, 11:38 AM
👁 3
Andrew Tate and his brother told a US judge that their controversial online persona was a performed character, not a genuine belief.
The brothers of former kick‑boxing champion Andrew Tate appeared before a federal judge in New York to address the charges stemming from their online activities. They are accused of promoting extremist content and influencing young men through a self‑styled "ultra‑masculine" persona.
During the hearing, both Andrew and his sibling contended that the provocative statements and lifestyle advice they disseminated were part of an act, akin to a performance, rather than a reflection of their true convictions.
The defense emphasized that the brothers have consistently framed their online presence as entertainment, arguing that viewers should interpret the content as fictional role‑play. The judge, however, indicated that the court will consider whether the alleged intent to deceive can be substantiated before any ruling on the defense is made.
A decision on bail and further procedural steps is expected in the coming weeks, as the case proceeds under heightened public scrutiny.
The outcome could set a precedent for how courts evaluate the line between online performance and alleged criminal intent.
During the hearing, both Andrew and his sibling contended that the provocative statements and lifestyle advice they disseminated were part of an act, akin to a performance, rather than a reflection of their true convictions.
The defense emphasized that the brothers have consistently framed their online presence as entertainment, arguing that viewers should interpret the content as fictional role‑play. The judge, however, indicated that the court will consider whether the alleged intent to deceive can be substantiated before any ruling on the defense is made.
A decision on bail and further procedural steps is expected in the coming weeks, as the case proceeds under heightened public scrutiny.
The outcome could set a precedent for how courts evaluate the line between online performance and alleged criminal intent.