📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Subhashish Panigrahi
Politics
Supreme Court Questions Sonam Raghuvanshi’s Conduct After Husband’s Attack
✍️ The New Indian Express
🗓 22 Jul 2026, 05:18 AM
👁 1
The Supreme Court has raised concerns about the conduct of former MP Sonam Raghuvanshi following an incident in which her husband was attacked.
The Supreme Court of India has formally questioned the conduct of former Member of Parliament Sonam Raghuvanshi in connection with an incident that saw her husband attacked.
Raghuvanshi, who represented the Lucknow constituency as a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party, has been under scrutiny after reports emerged that her spouse was assaulted in a public setting.
In a written submission to the Court, the petitioner highlighted that Raghuvanshi’s response to the attack was deemed inadequate and potentially obstructive to the investigation. The Court has requested a detailed explanation from her regarding her actions and any steps taken to protect her husband.
The matter is now part of the Court’s docket, and a hearing is scheduled to take place in the coming weeks. The proceedings will determine whether any further action is required against the former MP.
Legal experts note that the Supreme Court’s intervention underscores the seriousness with which it treats allegations involving public officials and the protection of their families.
Raghuvanshi, who represented the Lucknow constituency as a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party, has been under scrutiny after reports emerged that her spouse was assaulted in a public setting.
In a written submission to the Court, the petitioner highlighted that Raghuvanshi’s response to the attack was deemed inadequate and potentially obstructive to the investigation. The Court has requested a detailed explanation from her regarding her actions and any steps taken to protect her husband.
The matter is now part of the Court’s docket, and a hearing is scheduled to take place in the coming weeks. The proceedings will determine whether any further action is required against the former MP.
Legal experts note that the Supreme Court’s intervention underscores the seriousness with which it treats allegations involving public officials and the protection of their families.