📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Pinakpani
Business
Supreme Court lists GR Infra Projects Ltd vs Madhya Pradesh case (LiveLaw 2026 SC 852)
✍️ Live Law
🗓 24 Aug 2026, 02:04 PM
👁 3
Live Law reports that the Supreme Court has recorded the case of M/s G.R. Infra Projects Limited, Ratlam, against the State of Madhya Pradesh and others, cited as 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 852.
The Supreme Court of India has entered the litigation titled M/s G.R. Infra Projects Limited, Ratlam v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. into its official records, as documented by legal news portal Live Law. The case is identified by the citation 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 852, indicating its registration in the year 2026.
The petitioner, G.R. Infra Projects Limited, is a corporate entity based in Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh, and has filed the suit against the state government and additional respondents. No further details about the subject matter of the dispute have been disclosed in the available report.
Live Law, a specialist platform covering judicial developments, provided the brief notice of the case filing without elaborating on the claims, relief sought, or the stage of proceedings. The entry signals that the matter will be heard before the apex court, where legal arguments from both sides will be examined.
Stakeholders and observers will await subsequent filings and oral arguments to understand the implications of the dispute for the infrastructure sector and state‑government relations in Madhya Pradesh.
The petitioner, G.R. Infra Projects Limited, is a corporate entity based in Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh, and has filed the suit against the state government and additional respondents. No further details about the subject matter of the dispute have been disclosed in the available report.
Live Law, a specialist platform covering judicial developments, provided the brief notice of the case filing without elaborating on the claims, relief sought, or the stage of proceedings. The entry signals that the matter will be heard before the apex court, where legal arguments from both sides will be examined.
Stakeholders and observers will await subsequent filings and oral arguments to understand the implications of the dispute for the infrastructure sector and state‑government relations in Madhya Pradesh.