📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / [1] (website states that their images are free)
Politics
Samajwadi Party condemns UP government's ban on jobs for those advocating violent regime change
✍️ NDTV
🗓 29 Oct 2026, 02:31 PM
👁 8
Uttar Pradesh's administration barred candidates seeking violent regime change from state jobs, prompting sharp criticism from the Samajwadi Party.
The Uttar Pradesh government issued an order declaring that any applicant who expresses a desire for violent regime change will be deemed ineligible for state government positions. The directive, aimed at safeguarding the state's administrative machinery, was circulated among departmental heads earlier this week.
In response, the Samajwadi Party publicly denounced the measure, labeling it an affront to democratic principles and an attempt to stifle legitimate political dissent. Party representatives argued that the criteria are vague and could be misused to target opposition supporters.
The party called on the state administration to withdraw the order immediately and urged the government to respect constitutional freedoms while maintaining law and order. The controversy has ignited a broader debate over the balance between security concerns and the right to political expression in employment decisions.
Legal experts note that while the state can set eligibility norms, any restriction must align with the Constitution's guarantee of free speech and fair opportunity. The issue is expected to be examined in the courts if the party pursues legal action.
Meanwhile, civil society groups have also voiced apprehension, warning that such blanket bans could set a precedent affecting future hiring practices across Indian states.
In response, the Samajwadi Party publicly denounced the measure, labeling it an affront to democratic principles and an attempt to stifle legitimate political dissent. Party representatives argued that the criteria are vague and could be misused to target opposition supporters.
The party called on the state administration to withdraw the order immediately and urged the government to respect constitutional freedoms while maintaining law and order. The controversy has ignited a broader debate over the balance between security concerns and the right to political expression in employment decisions.
Legal experts note that while the state can set eligibility norms, any restriction must align with the Constitution's guarantee of free speech and fair opportunity. The issue is expected to be examined in the courts if the party pursues legal action.
Meanwhile, civil society groups have also voiced apprehension, warning that such blanket bans could set a precedent affecting future hiring practices across Indian states.