📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Harvinder Chandigarh
Politics
Punjab High Court Orders Govt to Explain DGPI Appointment Delay Within 10 Days
✍️ Amar Ujala · Punjab
🗓 01 Oct 2026, 10:01 PM
👁 9
The Punjab High Court has issued a strict directive to the state government, demanding a response within ten days on the delay in appointing a regular Director General of Police, noting that the issue is also pending before the Supreme Court with a hearing slated for October 8.
During a recent hearing, the Punjab High Court expressed dissatisfaction with the state government's delay in confirming a regular Director General of Police (DGPI). The bench directed the administration to furnish a detailed explanation within ten days, emphasizing the importance of timely police leadership appointments.
In its response, the Punjab government informed the court that the DGPI appointment issue is currently before the Supreme Court, where a hearing has been scheduled for 8 October. The state argued that the pending Supreme Court proceedings have constrained its ability to finalize the regular appointment.
The High Court's order underscores the judiciary's insistence on swift action, warning that prolonged delays could affect law‑and‑order management in the state. The government is expected to submit its reply within the stipulated period, after which the court may decide on further measures, including possible contempt proceedings if the response is deemed unsatisfactory.
In its response, the Punjab government informed the court that the DGPI appointment issue is currently before the Supreme Court, where a hearing has been scheduled for 8 October. The state argued that the pending Supreme Court proceedings have constrained its ability to finalize the regular appointment.
The High Court's order underscores the judiciary's insistence on swift action, warning that prolonged delays could affect law‑and‑order management in the state. The government is expected to submit its reply within the stipulated period, after which the court may decide on further measures, including possible contempt proceedings if the response is deemed unsatisfactory.