📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / A.Savin
Politics
Bombay HC stalls Imran Khan's leave India notice, Centre says no coercion
✍️ Mid-Day
🗓 28 Oct 2026, 06:07 AM
👁 20
The Bombay High Court has put on hold the notice ordering former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan to leave India, while the Indian government says it will not take any coercive steps.
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday issued an interim order staying the notice that required former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan to depart India. The notice, which had been served by the Ministry of Home Affairs, was challenged by Khan's legal team on grounds of procedural irregularities.
The court's decision means Khan can remain in the country pending a full hearing on the matter. The bench did not comment on the merits of the case, limiting its order to a temporary suspension of the notice.
In response, a senior official of the Ministry of Home Affairs said the government respects the court's ruling and will not resort to any coercive action against Khan. The official added that the ministry will continue to monitor the situation and cooperate with the judiciary.
Legal experts note that the case underscores the delicate diplomatic balance between India and Pakistan, especially when high‑profile political figures are involved. The outcome of the pending hearing could have implications for future cross‑border legal proceedings.
The court's decision means Khan can remain in the country pending a full hearing on the matter. The bench did not comment on the merits of the case, limiting its order to a temporary suspension of the notice.
In response, a senior official of the Ministry of Home Affairs said the government respects the court's ruling and will not resort to any coercive action against Khan. The official added that the ministry will continue to monitor the situation and cooperate with the judiciary.
Legal experts note that the case underscores the delicate diplomatic balance between India and Pakistan, especially when high‑profile political figures are involved. The outcome of the pending hearing could have implications for future cross‑border legal proceedings.