📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Yann (talk)
Education
Bihar BPSC Official’s ‘Elephant Walks, Dogs Bark’ Comment Sparks Student Outcry
✍️ India Today
🗓 25 Aug 2026, 06:04 AM
👁 5
A remark by a Bihar Public Service Commission official comparing a situation to “elephant walks, dogs bark” has provoked anger among aspirants, leading to protests on campus.
The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) official’s off‑hand comment, likening a recent development to “elephant walks, dogs bark,” ignited sharp criticism from students preparing for the state civil services exam. The phrase, perceived as dismissive, quickly spread on social media and prompted a wave of discontent among aspirants who felt the analogy trivialised their concerns.
Student groups convened outside the BPSC office, voicing that the remark undermined the seriousness of the examination process and the challenges faced by candidates. They demanded a formal apology and clarification, emphasizing the need for respectful communication from officials overseeing the recruitment framework.
In response, the BPSC issued a brief statement indicating that the comment was made in an informal setting and was not intended to offend. The commission pledged to review its communication protocols but stopped short of offering a direct apology, leaving the student community unsatisfied.
The incident has reignited a broader debate about the tone of public officials when addressing exam‑related issues, with many calling for clearer guidelines to ensure that future interactions remain professional and supportive of candidates.
Student groups convened outside the BPSC office, voicing that the remark undermined the seriousness of the examination process and the challenges faced by candidates. They demanded a formal apology and clarification, emphasizing the need for respectful communication from officials overseeing the recruitment framework.
In response, the BPSC issued a brief statement indicating that the comment was made in an informal setting and was not intended to offend. The commission pledged to review its communication protocols but stopped short of offering a direct apology, leaving the student community unsatisfied.
The incident has reignited a broader debate about the tone of public officials when addressing exam‑related issues, with many calling for clearer guidelines to ensure that future interactions remain professional and supportive of candidates.